A.R.S. 32-1123: Unlicensed Contractor Bidding in Arizona

A.R.S. 32-1123 punishes bidding on work without the right license. If an unlicensed entity bids on a project worth more than $1,000, the Registrar can refuse to license them for a full year. The bid itself, not just doing the work, is what triggers the penalty.

Updated June 29, 2026 3 min read
Primary sourceA.R.S. 32-1123 (Unlicensed contractors; bidding; denial of license)

Most people assume the line you cannot cross is doing construction without a license. A.R.S. 32-1123 moves that line earlier. In Arizona, an unlicensed entity that even bids on a project over a small dollar threshold can be locked out of getting a license for a year. This section exists to stop unlicensed operators from chasing work they are not allowed to do, and it gives the Registrar a tool that bites before a shovel ever hits the ground.

What this statute says

The rule keys off the bid and a dollar amount. If a business that is not licensed, or not licensed for the right scope, bids on a project worth more than $1,000, the Registrar can deny it a license for a year. Here is the operative language:

if an entity that is not licensed or not properly licensed for the work pursuant to this chapter bids on a contract for a project with an aggregate worth of more than one thousand dollars, the registrar may not issue the entity a license for one year after the bid date.

So the penalty attaches to the act of bidding, not just to performing the work. The clock runs one year from the bid date, which can delay an operator's path to ever becoming legitimate.

What this means for you

For a homeowner, this section is a quiet form of protection. It discourages unlicensed operators from even pitching you on a large job, because doing so can cost them a year of eligibility. A real example: someone without a license bids $60,000 to build a casita on your Cave Creek lot. That bid alone can bar them from getting an ROC license for the next year, on top of the other penalties for unlicensed contracting.

The statute is not all hammer. For smaller bids, between $1,000 and $20,000, an entity with no prior warning gets a written warning instead of the one-year denial on a first offense. That gives a genuinely new contractor a chance to correct course rather than being shut out. The denial rule also does not reach certain public and federal projects, such as Department of Transportation work and projects governed by federal acquisition rules, and it does not apply to people who are properly exempt under A.R.S. 32-1121 .

How this connects to the rest of the law

This section reinforces the licensing requirement that flows from the contractor definition in A.R.S. 32-1101 and the classification rules in A.R.S. 32-1102 . It is one of several enforcement tools the Arizona Registrar of Contractors holds, alongside license denial during qualification under A.R.S. 32-1122 . The best homeowner defense is to confirm licensing before you accept any bid, which is covered in how to verify an Arizona contractor license with the ROC .

Full text and source

Read the current version, including the warning and exemption details and any amendments, on the legislature's site: View A.R.S. 32-1123 on azleg.gov .

Whether a specific bid triggers the rule depends on the facts, so confirm with the ROC or a qualified attorney before relying on it.

All Arizona Building Law
Desert landscape
Build With Us

Begin Your Build

Relax while we manage every detail, throughout the entire process. Tell us about your vision, and we'll be in touch to schedule a consultation.

How can we help?

Call usText us